A static equipment engineer having strength in FEA analysis specialized in structural analysis of pressure vessels and its components using international codes and standards, project co-ordination and software tool development skills.


BASF Chemicals Inda Pvt. Ltd., April 2019 to Present, Mumbai India

Associate Chief Engineer  
TechnipFMC, September 2011 to April 2019, Delhi India
(Oil and Gas)
Responsible for carrying out mechanical calculations using PV-Elite etc. software and reviewing vendors designs. Involved in supporting Site activities, supervision for critical works related to pressure equipment’s at site. Responsible for carrying out Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for pressure vessel equipment using FEA tools and ASME B&PV code for various domestic and international projects in oil and gas field.

Principal Engineer  
Toyo India, June 2003 to September 2011, Mumbai India
(Oil and Gas)
Involved is establishing Applied Technology Department and framing up the scope, roles and responsibility, resource planning, Man hour estimation. Lead the team of 16 engineers to carry out FEA, CFD, Surge and Pulsation analysis. Responsible to carryout FEA analysis for pressure equipment’s for domestic projects. Also supporting projects executed from Toyo Japan Involved in developing FEA team in Applied Technology department and mentoring them Responsible for carrying out finite Element Analysis (FEA) for pressure vessel equipment’s using FEA tools and ASME B&PV code for various domestic and international projects.

SRES CoE Kopargaon, Maharashtra, February 2002 to May 2003, Kopargaon
(Education Institute)
Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering for pre-final and final year graduation students.

Project Trainee Engineer  
Thermax Ltd., January 2001 to January 2002, Pune India
Developed mathematical modeling and programmed in VB6 for exchanger network simulation. Program is based on Finite Element Analysis of heat exchanger network considering individual heat exchanger as an element and stream ends are nodes. Responsible for thermal and hydraulic design of various types of heat exchangers (shell-and-tube, fin type cross flow exchangers, double-pipe exchangers, and plate exchangers).


Government College of Engineering Karad  
Master Of Science, M.E. Heat Power, Aug, 2000 to Feb, 2002

Pune University  
Bachelor of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Aug, 1995 to Jun, 1999


Finite Element Analysis of Heat Exchanger Network     
Published by (IJSER)
Authors: Mahesh Kulkarni.  Published March 03, 2018

Basic principles of Finite Element Analysis, discretization and applying basic principles to get the elemental solution and then by summation of results complex problem is solved. Same approach is used in the study. Mathematical model for outlet temperature of heat exchanger based on effec-tiveness-NTU method is prepared. Network of heat exchangers is divided into number of elements i.e. exchangers. For outlet temperature of each exchanger, developed model is used and generate set of linear equations. Equations are solved using numerical techniques. Final results are compared with commercial software HTRI results and found within ±1% tolerance.

Published by (The Royal Institution of Naval Architects)
Authors: Saisushank Botu, Mahesh D. Kulkarni, Rudranath Banerjee.  Published December 11, 2015

An 8300 MT deck was to be transported and installed on an offshore platform located 60kms south of Mumbai coast. The entire structure was to be loaded out on to a vessel from jetty using skidding system. The profile of the vessel made the stern section attract very heavy stresses and vulnerable during transfer of the deck. To understand the stress pattern and determine the values, a finite element model simulating the whole operation was developed and analyzed. Since the obtained values were much above the allowable limits, grillage and outrigger arrangement was hence modified. The revised stresses were found within the permissible limits and made the vessel stern structurally adequate to perform the loadout operation.

Finite Element Analysis based SIF Calculation and Comparison with various approaches for SIF Calculation     
Published by (ASME PVP)
Authors: Mahesh Kulkarni, Vivek Dewangan.  Published 

Detailed FEA, PRG ASME work, B31.3 and WRC329 approaches for SIF calculation are studied in detail. It is found that B31.3 provide the SIF values for run pipe only and are high. PRG used NozzlePro program and provide formulation for SIF. Detailed FEA was done as per guidelines in TR-110996. SIF calculated by detailed FEA are in line with PRG approach. Detailed FEA gives least values of SIF in run pipe. SIF values in branch pipe by FEA are more than PRG approach. WRC329 gives the SIF values in branch pipe only for few cases. From the study, it is concluded that detailed FEA and PRG approaches are in line. B31.3 results high value of SIF in run pipe. If these SIF values are used, it will be overdesign. As B31.3 does not have parameter of branch size, SIF calculated by B31.3 can not be used for analysis. For optimal design of the piping system, detailed FEA approach or PRG approach will be used.


Idea to Implementation (12i)
i2i award by Technip India in 2017

Pat on the back award
For Excellent contribution to FEA Analysis in HRD project